WILD ENDURO REAR GUM-X vs Mud King ProTection review

In this entry we are going to compare and review Michelin WILD ENDURO REAR GUM-X vs Continental Mud King ProTection tyres. Both manufactured by different brands, Michelin and Continental respectively, these tyres have been designed to be used for different purposes. Whilst Michelin WILD ENDURO REAR GUM-X is better for mtb activities, Continental Mud King ProTection is a great choice if your needs are more aligned to Mountainbike Tires activities.

WILD ENDURO REAR GUM-X	Mud King ProTection

Ride wherever you want with a tire designed specifically for use on the rear wheel	At home in the mud
Thanks to a tread pattern optimized for rear use and providing excellent performance and maximum progressivity	For deep, muddy conditions with a narrow casing for adequate frame clearance.Knobbly tread for optimum braking and steering, even under the most difficult conditions.
Features -	Features ProTection Further details BlackChili It’s all about how you mix it With our unique tread compound, which is produced only in Germany, we have revolutionised the sport of cycling. With the legendary BlackChili Compound we have answered the eternal question of the best balance of grip and rolling resistance for cycling. Regular test wins confirm the measureable and noticeable advantages for the cyclist, established in the laboratory and on the road. The latest polymers as well as specially developed carbon black particles and filler materials guarantee unique performance Further details
Usage enduro e-bike	Usage -
Technologies -	Technologies -
-	-
-	-

WILD ENDURO REAR GUM-X vs Mud King ProTection review

Features

Features

ProTection

BlackChili

Usage

Usage

Technologies

Technologies