Tempo II vs WILD ENDURO FRONT MAGI-X review

In this entry we are going to compare and review Continental Tempo II vs Michelin WILD ENDURO FRONT MAGI-X tyres. Both manufactured by different brands, Continental and Michelin respectively, these tyres have been designed to be used for different purposes. Whilst Continental Tempo II is better for Race Tires activities, Michelin WILD ENDURO FRONT MAGI-X is a great choice if your needs are more aligned to mtb activities.

Tempo II	WILD ENDURO FRONT MAGI-X

The velodrome all-rounder for all track disciplines	Developed for the front wheel with better grip at high speed for experts
Particularly light and fast racing tire designed for the concrete and wooden surfaces of velodromes.No compromise design: made with a particularly fine carcass and a slightly roughened slick tread.	Thanks to a tread pattern designed for the front wheel. Its block design provides more progressivity and terrain versatility.
Features BlackChili It’s all about how you mix it With our unique tread compound, which is produced only in Germany, we have revolutionised the sport of cycling. With the legendary BlackChili Compound we have answered the eternal question of the best balance of grip and rolling resistance for cycling. Regular test wins confirm the measureable and noticeable advantages for the cyclist, established in the laboratory and on the road. The latest polymers as well as specially developed carbon black particles and filler materials guarantee unique performance Further details	Features -
Usage -	Usage enduro e-bike
Technologies -	Technologies -
-	-
-	-

Tempo II vs WILD ENDURO FRONT MAGI-X review

Features

BlackChili

Features

Usage

Usage

Technologies

Technologies