Tempo II vs PROTEK CROSS MAX review

In this entry we are going to compare and review Continental Tempo II vs Michelin PROTEK CROSS MAX tyres. Both manufactured by different brands, Continental and Michelin respectively, these tyres have been designed to be used for different purposes. Whilst Continental Tempo II is better for Race Tires activities, Michelin PROTEK CROSS MAX is a great choice if your needs are more aligned to city activities.

Tempo II	PROTEK CROSS MAX

The velodrome all-rounder for all track disciplines	More strenghts for on and off-road exploring
Particularly light and fast racing tire designed for the concrete and wooden surfaces of velodromes.No compromise design: made with a particularly fine carcass and a slightly roughened slick tread.	Thanks to the new generation of 5mm reinforcement offering effective anti-puncture protection
Features BlackChili It’s all about how you mix it With our unique tread compound, which is produced only in Germany, we have revolutionised the sport of cycling. With the legendary BlackChili Compound we have answered the eternal question of the best balance of grip and rolling resistance for cycling. Regular test wins confirm the measureable and noticeable advantages for the cyclist, established in the laboratory and on the road. The latest polymers as well as specially developed carbon black particles and filler materials guarantee unique performance Further details	Features -
Usage -	Usage urban trekking
Technologies -	Technologies -
-	-
-	-

Tempo II vs PROTEK CROSS MAX review

Features

BlackChili

Features

Usage

Usage

Technologies

Technologies