PROTEK CROSS vs Double Fighter III review
In this entry we are going to compare and review Michelin PROTEK CROSS vs Continental Double Fighter III tyres. Both manufactured by different brands, Michelin and Continental respectively, these tyres have been designed to be used for different purposes. Whilst Michelin PROTEK CROSS is better for city activities, Continental Double Fighter III is a great choice if your needs are more aligned to Mountainbike Tires activities.
PROTEK CROSS | Double Fighter III | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Thanks to the new generation of 1mm reinforcement offering effective anti-puncture protection | The ‘double’: light rolling and quiet on tarmac, yet grips on tracks and gravel roads.Robust rubber sidewalls make it impervious to damage even over rough ground.The ideal tire for transforming an off road bike to a nippy city racer. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Features- | Features
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Usageurban trekking | Usage- | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Technologies- | Technologies- | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
- | - | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
- | Specifications"29"
"28"
"27.5"
"26"
"24"
"20"
"16"
|