PROTEK CROSS MAX vs Tempo II review

In this entry we are going to compare and review Michelin PROTEK CROSS MAX vs Continental Tempo II tyres. Both manufactured by different brands, Michelin and Continental respectively, these tyres have been designed to be used for different purposes. Whilst Michelin PROTEK CROSS MAX is better for city activities, Continental Tempo II is a great choice if your needs are more aligned to Race Tires activities.

PROTEK CROSS MAX	Tempo II

More strenghts for on and off-road exploring	The velodrome all-rounder for all track disciplines
Thanks to the new generation of 5mm reinforcement offering effective anti-puncture protection	Particularly light and fast racing tire designed for the concrete and wooden surfaces of velodromes.No compromise design: made with a particularly fine carcass and a slightly roughened slick tread.
Features -	Features BlackChili It’s all about how you mix it With our unique tread compound, which is produced only in Germany, we have revolutionised the sport of cycling. With the legendary BlackChili Compound we have answered the eternal question of the best balance of grip and rolling resistance for cycling. Regular test wins confirm the measureable and noticeable advantages for the cyclist, established in the laboratory and on the road. The latest polymers as well as specially developed carbon black particles and filler materials guarantee unique performance Further details
Usage urban trekking	Usage -
Technologies -	Technologies -
-	-
-	-

PROTEK CROSS MAX vs Tempo II review

Features

Features

BlackChili

Usage

Usage

Technologies

Technologies