POWER CYCLOCROSS MUD vs Sprinter Gatorskin review

In this entry we are going to compare and review Michelin POWER CYCLOCROSS MUD vs Continental Sprinter Gatorskin tyres. Both manufactured by different brands, Michelin and Continental respectively, these tyres have been designed to be used for different purposes. Whilst Michelin POWER CYCLOCROSS MUD is better for road activities, Continental Sprinter Gatorskin is a great choice if your needs are more aligned to Race Tires activities.

POWER CYCLOCROSS MUD	Sprinter Gatorskin

Control you change of direction in mud terrain	The robust sprinter, created for extended rides and training
New tread pattern with spaced lugs for even better road holding in mud terrain	The roads of Flanders, Roubaix and San Remo are home to this tough tubular.Durable and puncture protected carcass, ready for hundreds of kilometres, even on bad roads.
Features -	Features DuraSkin To roll with the punches Tires with DuraSkin® sidewall protection have to be able to roll with the punches. They are used under the harshest conditions. On messenger bikes, the tires skid along curbs; on touring bikes, they cross continents without wearing out. In racing cycling, they have to endure tough tests such as the Paris-Roubaix. The high-quality polyamide fabric protects the tire casing against the worst conditions. These tires stand out thanks to their brown sidewalls. SafetySystem Breaker Puncture protection with a system The SafetySystem Breaker is made up of Kevlarreinforced, high-strength nylon fabric. Puncture and cut-resistant but nevertheless light and flexible, the tire adjusts quickly to the surface below. Without raising the weight or rolling resistance noticeably, it protects the carcass against foreign objects and contributes to a longer lifespan of the tire. Tires with the SafetySystem Breaker also provide good comfort properties.
Usage cyclocross	Usage -
Technologies -	Technologies -
-	-
-	-

POWER CYCLOCROSS MUD vs Sprinter Gatorskin review

Features

Features

DuraSkin

SafetySystem Breaker

Usage

Usage

Technologies

Technologies