Hometrainer vs E-WILD FRONT review

In this entry we are going to compare and review Continental Hometrainer vs Michelin E-WILD FRONT tyres. Both manufactured by different brands, Continental and Michelin respectively, these tyres have been designed to be used for different purposes. Whilst Continental Hometrainer is better for Race Tires activities, Michelin E-WILD FRONT is a great choice if your needs are more aligned to mtb activities.

Hometrainer

E-WILD FRONT

Developed for the essential basic training at home. Particularly smooth running.The durable cold-running compound stops heat build up.! Suitable for training on rollers/home trainers only.

Using E-GUM-X, a new rubber compromising lateral and central rubbers designed to optimize grip, with a tread pattern from the Enduro ranges for a better hold.

The km accumulator on the rollers

Keep on rolling : this will take you everywhere

Developed for the essential basic training at home. Particularly smooth running.The durable cold-running compound stops heat build up.! Suitable for training on rollers/home trainers only.

Using E-GUM-X, a new rubber compromising lateral and central rubbers designed to optimize grip, with a tread pattern from the Enduro ranges for a better hold.

Features

Usage

enduro

e-bike

Technologies

Specifications

"28"

Article: 0100649
ETRTO: 32 - 622 Dimension: 700 X 32C Technology: Color/Sidewall/Bead: black/black skin foldable TPI: 3/180 g: 275 PSI: 102

Article: 0100647
ETRTO: 23 - 622 Dimension: 700 X 23C Technology: Color/Sidewall/Bead: black/black skin foldable TPI: 3/180 g: 205 PSI: 120

"27.5"

Article: 0101275
ETRTO: 50 - 584 Dimension: 27.5 X 2.00 Technology: Color/Sidewall/Bead: black/black skin foldable TPI: 3/180 g: 400 PSI: 65

"26"

Article: 0100648
ETRTO: 47 - 559 Dimension: 26 X 1.75 Technology: Color/Sidewall/Bead: black/black skin foldable TPI: 3/180 g: 365 PSI: 65