Gatorskin vs FORCE XC COMPETITION LINE review

In this entry we are going to compare and review Continental Gatorskin vs Michelin FORCE XC COMPETITION LINE tyres. Both manufactured by different brands, Continental and Michelin respectively, these tyres have been designed to be used for different purposes. Whilst Continental Gatorskin is better for Race Tires activities, Michelin FORCE XC COMPETITION LINE is a great choice if your needs are more aligned to mtb activities.

Gatorskin

FORCE XC COMPETITION LINE

The right tire when it comes to tough conditions.The right choice for a strong performance in the urban field and on tour.

Thanks to GUM-X3D technology which is a combination of three special rubbers: an outer traction compound, a Race Compound base layer and a special side grip compound

Ride how and where you want: the global number one for Fixed, Messenger and Urban Cyclists

The most agile cross-country tire for a competition use

The right tire when it comes to tough conditions.The right choice for a strong performance in the urban field and on tour.

Thanks to GUM-X3D technology which is a combination of three special rubbers: an outer traction compound, a Race Compound base layer and a special side grip compound

Features

DuraSkin
To roll with the punches
Tires with DuraSkin® sidewall protection have to be able to roll with the punches. They are used under the harshest conditions. On messenger bikes, the tires skid along curbs; on touring bikes, they cross continents without wearing out. In racing cycling, they have to endure tough tests such as the Paris-Roubaix. The high-quality polyamide fabric protects the tire casing against the worst conditions. These tires stand out thanks to their brown sidewalls.
PolyX Breaker
Puncture-defence
With our PolyX Breaker®, we bring our car expertise to the bicycle tire segment: Polyester has been used successfully for years in car tires and been tried and tested many times. The extremely resistant polyester fibre is woven tightly crosswise. In this way, a very high fabric density is reached which not only makes the Breaker more resistant to foreign objects but is also especially resistant to punctures. The rolling resistance is also not negatively affected by the PolyX Breaker®.

Features

Usage

cross country

Technologies

Specifications

"27"

Article: 0122300
ETRTO: 32 - 630 Dimension: 27 X 1 1/4 Technology: PolyX Breaker Color/Sidewall/Bead: black/black skin TPI: 3/180 g: 430 PSI: 102

"28"

Article: 0100642
ETRTO: 32 - 622 Dimension: 700 X 32C Technology: PolyX Breaker Color/Sidewall/Bead: black/black skin foldable TPI: 3/180 g: 345 PSI: 102

Article: 0100437
ETRTO: 32 - 622 Dimension: 700 X 32C Technology: PolyX Breaker Color/Sidewall/Bead: black/black skin TPI: 3/180 g: 420 PSI: 102

Article: 0121228
ETRTO: 28 - 622 Dimension: 700 X 28C Technology: PolyX Breaker Color/Sidewall/Bead: black/black skin TPI: 3/180 g: 360 PSI: 116

Article: 0100641
ETRTO: 28 - 622 Dimension: 700 X 28C Technology: PolyX Breaker Color/Sidewall/Bead: black/black skin foldable TPI: 3/180 g: 280 PSI: 116

Article: 0100084
ETRTO: 25 - 622 Dimension: 700 X 25C Technology: PolyX Breaker Color/Sidewall/Bead: black/black skin foldable TPI: 3/180 g: 245 PSI: 120

Article: 0118539
ETRTO: 25 - 622 Dimension: 700 X 25C Technology: PolyX Breaker Color/Sidewall/Bead: black/black skin TPI: 3/180 g: 315 PSI: 120

Article: 0118537
ETRTO: 23 - 622 Dimension: 700 X 23C Technology: PolyX Breaker Color/Sidewall/Bead: black/black skin TPI: 3/180 g: 305 PSI: 120

Article: 0118538
ETRTO: 23 - 622 Dimension: 700 X 23C Technology: PolyX Breaker Color/Sidewall/Bead: black/black skin foldable TPI: 3/180 g: 230 PSI: 120

"26"

Article: 0118364
ETRTO: 23 - 571 Dimension: 650 X 23C Technology: PolyX Breaker Color/Sidewall/Bead: black/black skin TPI: 3/180 g: 275 PSI: 120

Article: 0118365
ETRTO: 28 - 559 Dimension: 26 X 1 1/8 Technology: PolyX Breaker Color/Sidewall/Bead: black/black skin TPI: 3/180 g: 320 PSI: 120

Gatorskin vs FORCE XC COMPETITION LINE review

Features

DuraSkin

PolyX Breaker

Features

Usage

Usage

Technologies

Technologies

Specifications

"27"

"28"

"26"