E-WILD FRONT vs Aggressor review
In this entry we are going to compare and review Michelin E-WILD FRONT vs Maxxis Aggressor tyres. Both manufactured by different brands, Michelin and Maxxis respectively, these tyres have been designed to be used for different purposes. Whilst Michelin E-WILD FRONT is better for mtb activities, Maxxis Aggressor is a great choice if your needs are more aligned to mountain activities.
E-WILD FRONT | Aggressor | ||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Using E-GUM-X, a new rubber compromising lateral and central rubbers designed to optimize grip, with a tread pattern from the Enduro ranges for a better hold. | The Maxxis Aggressor is designed for high-speed, hard-packed, rocky trails. It works especially well as a rear tire paired with a Minion DHF or Assegai in the front. | ||||||||||||||||
Features- | Features
| ||||||||||||||||
Usageenduro e-bike | UsageTrail Enduro | ||||||||||||||||
Technologies- | Technologies
| ||||||||||||||||
- | - | ||||||||||||||||
- | Specifications26
27.5
29
|