Double Fighter III vs Receptor review
In this entry we are going to compare and review Continental Double Fighter III vs Maxxis Receptor tyres. Both manufactured by different brands, Continental and Maxxis respectively, these tyres have been designed to be used for different purposes. Whilst Continental Double Fighter III is better for Mountainbike Tires activities, Maxxis Receptor is a great choice if your needs are more aligned to gravel and hybrid activities.
| Double Fighter III | Receptor | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
The ‘double’: light rolling and quiet on tarmac, yet grips on tracks and gravel roads.Robust rubber sidewalls make it impervious to damage even over rough ground.The ideal tire for transforming an off road bike to a nippy city racer. | The Maxxis Receptor is a semi-slick gravel tire designed for riding on pavement, hard-packed dirt roads, and light gravel. With its low profile center tread, the Receptor rolls easily no matter the surface. Small side knobs provide cornering traction in loose over hard terrain. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Features
| Features
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Usage- | UsageGravel | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Technologies- | Technologies
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| - | - | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Specifications"29"
"28"
"27.5"
"26"
"24"
"20"
"16"
| Specifications650
700
|
