Double Fighter III vs PROTEK CROSS review
In this entry we are going to compare and review Continental Double Fighter III vs Michelin PROTEK CROSS tyres. Both manufactured by different brands, Continental and Michelin respectively, these tyres have been designed to be used for different purposes. Whilst Continental Double Fighter III is better for Mountainbike Tires activities, Michelin PROTEK CROSS is a great choice if your needs are more aligned to city activities.
| Double Fighter III | PROTEK CROSS | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
The ‘double’: light rolling and quiet on tarmac, yet grips on tracks and gravel roads.Robust rubber sidewalls make it impervious to damage even over rough ground.The ideal tire for transforming an off road bike to a nippy city racer. | Thanks to the new generation of 1mm reinforcement offering effective anti-puncture protection | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Features
| Features- | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Usage- | Usageurban trekking | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Technologies- | Technologies- | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| - | - | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Specifications"29"
"28"
"27.5"
"26"
"24"
"20"
"16"
| - |
