Double Fighter III vs E-WILD FRONT review
In this entry we are going to compare and review Continental Double Fighter III vs Michelin E-WILD FRONT tyres. Both manufactured by different brands, Continental and Michelin respectively, these tyres have been designed to be used for different purposes. Whilst Continental Double Fighter III is better for Mountainbike Tires activities, Michelin E-WILD FRONT is a great choice if your needs are more aligned to mtb activities.
| Double Fighter III | E-WILD FRONT | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
The ‘double’: light rolling and quiet on tarmac, yet grips on tracks and gravel roads.Robust rubber sidewalls make it impervious to damage even over rough ground.The ideal tire for transforming an off road bike to a nippy city racer. | Using E-GUM-X, a new rubber compromising lateral and central rubbers designed to optimize grip, with a tread pattern from the Enduro ranges for a better hold. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Features
| Features- | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Usage- | Usageenduro e-bike | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Technologies- | Technologies- | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| - | - | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Specifications"29"
"28"
"27.5"
"26"
"24"
"20"
"16"
| - |
