Double Fighter III vs Crossmark II review
In this entry we are going to compare and review Continental Double Fighter III vs Maxxis Crossmark II tyres. Both manufactured by different brands, Continental and Maxxis respectively, these tyres have been designed to be used for different purposes. Whilst Continental Double Fighter III is better for Mountainbike Tires activities, Maxxis Crossmark II is a great choice if your needs are more aligned to mountain activities.
| Double Fighter III | Crossmark II | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
The ‘double’: light rolling and quiet on tarmac, yet grips on tracks and gravel roads.Robust rubber sidewalls make it impervious to damage even over rough ground.The ideal tire for transforming an off road bike to a nippy city racer. | The Crossmark II improves on the speed of its predecessor while improving grip in intermediate conditions. The legendary center ridge still flies on hard pack, and the updated tread pattern provides better braking and cornering over a wide range of trail conditions. A great choice if you want to go fast everywhere. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Features
| Features
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Usage- | UsageXC (Cross Country) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Technologies- | Technologies- | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| - | - | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Specifications"29"
"28"
"27.5"
"26"
"24"
"20"
"16"
| Specifications26
27.5
29
|
