Double Fighter III vs Aggressor review
In this entry we are going to compare and review Continental Double Fighter III vs Maxxis Aggressor tyres. Both manufactured by different brands, Continental and Maxxis respectively, these tyres have been designed to be used for different purposes. Whilst Continental Double Fighter III is better for Mountainbike Tires activities, Maxxis Aggressor is a great choice if your needs are more aligned to mountain activities.
Double Fighter III | Aggressor | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
The ‘double’: light rolling and quiet on tarmac, yet grips on tracks and gravel roads.Robust rubber sidewalls make it impervious to damage even over rough ground.The ideal tire for transforming an off road bike to a nippy city racer. | The Maxxis Aggressor is designed for high-speed, hard-packed, rocky trails. It works especially well as a rear tire paired with a Minion DHF or Assegai in the front. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Features
| Features
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Usage- | UsageTrail Enduro | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Technologies- | Technologies
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
- | - | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Specifications"29"
"28"
"27.5"
"26"
"24"
"20"
"16"
| Specifications26
27.5
29
|