Crossmark II vs WILD ENDURO FRONT GUM-X review
In this entry we are going to compare and review Maxxis Crossmark II vs Michelin WILD ENDURO FRONT GUM-X tyres. Both manufactured by different brands, Maxxis and Michelin respectively, these tyres have been designed to be used for different purposes. Whilst Maxxis Crossmark II is better for mountain activities, Michelin WILD ENDURO FRONT GUM-X is a great choice if your needs are more aligned to mtb activities.
| Crossmark II | WILD ENDURO FRONT GUM-X | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
The Crossmark II improves on the speed of its predecessor while improving grip in intermediate conditions. The legendary center ridge still flies on hard pack, and the updated tread pattern provides better braking and cornering over a wide range of trail conditions. A great choice if you want to go fast everywhere. | Thanks to a tread pattern designed for the front wheel. Its block design provides more progressivity, terrain versatility and maximum braking grip. | ||||||
Features
| Features- | ||||||
UsageXC (Cross Country) | Usageenduro e-bike | ||||||
Technologies- | Technologies- | ||||||
| - | - | ||||||
Specifications26
27.5
29
| - |
