Crossmark II vs POWER CYCLOCROSS MUD TUBULAR review
In this entry we are going to compare and review Maxxis Crossmark II vs Michelin POWER CYCLOCROSS MUD TUBULAR tyres. Both manufactured by different brands, Maxxis and Michelin respectively, these tyres have been designed to be used for different purposes. Whilst Maxxis Crossmark II is better for mountain activities, Michelin POWER CYCLOCROSS MUD TUBULAR is a great choice if your needs are more aligned to road activities.
| Crossmark II | POWER CYCLOCROSS MUD TUBULAR | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
The Crossmark II improves on the speed of its predecessor while improving grip in intermediate conditions. The legendary center ridge still flies on hard pack, and the updated tread pattern provides better braking and cornering over a wide range of trail conditions. A great choice if you want to go fast everywhere. | Its tread pattern and tubular technology transmits pedalling power more effectively in mud terrain for a controlled grip | ||||||
Features
| Features- | ||||||
UsageXC (Cross Country) | Usagecyclocross | ||||||
Technologies- | Technologies- | ||||||
| - | - | ||||||
Specifications26
27.5
29
| - |
