Crossmark II vs E-WILD FRONT review
In this entry we are going to compare and review Maxxis Crossmark II vs Michelin E-WILD FRONT tyres. Both manufactured by different brands, Maxxis and Michelin respectively, these tyres have been designed to be used for different purposes. Whilst Maxxis Crossmark II is better for mountain activities, Michelin E-WILD FRONT is a great choice if your needs are more aligned to mtb activities.
| Crossmark II | E-WILD FRONT | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
The Crossmark II improves on the speed of its predecessor while improving grip in intermediate conditions. The legendary center ridge still flies on hard pack, and the updated tread pattern provides better braking and cornering over a wide range of trail conditions. A great choice if you want to go fast everywhere. | Using E-GUM-X, a new rubber compromising lateral and central rubbers designed to optimize grip, with a tread pattern from the Enduro ranges for a better hold. | ||||||
Features
| Features- | ||||||
UsageXC (Cross Country) | Usageenduro e-bike | ||||||
Technologies- | Technologies- | ||||||
| - | - | ||||||
Specifications26
27.5
29
| - |
