COUNTRY MUD vs Grand Prix Classic review

In this entry we are going to compare and review Michelin COUNTRY MUD vs Continental Grand Prix Classic tyres. Both manufactured by different brands, Michelin and Continental respectively, these tyres have been designed to be used for different purposes. Whilst Michelin COUNTRY MUD is better for mtb activities, Continental Grand Prix Classic is a great choice if your needs are more aligned to Race Tires activities.

COUNTRY MUD	Grand Prix Classic

The MTB tire for leisure use on muddy terrain	Technology of today combined with an old classic
	The perfect match for the retro styled racing bike.Features with brown sidewalls and the original Conti Sport tread pattern from 1982.
Features -	Features PolyX Breaker Puncture-defence With our PolyX Breaker®, we bring our car expertise to the bicycle tire segment: Polyester has been used successfully for years in car tires and been tried and tested many times. The extremely resistant polyester fibre is woven tightly crosswise. In this way, a very high fabric density is reached which not only makes the Breaker more resistant to foreign objects but is also especially resistant to punctures. The rolling resistance is also not negatively affected by the PolyX Breaker®. BlackChili It’s all about how you mix it With our unique tread compound, which is produced only in Germany, we have revolutionised the sport of cycling. With the legendary BlackChili Compound we have answered the eternal question of the best balance of grip and rolling resistance for cycling. Regular test wins confirm the measureable and noticeable advantages for the cyclist, established in the laboratory and on the road. The latest polymers as well as specially developed carbon black particles and filler materials guarantee unique performance Further details
Usage cross country everyday	Usage -
Technologies -	Technologies -
-	-
-	-

COUNTRY MUD vs Grand Prix Classic review

Features

Features

PolyX Breaker

BlackChili

Usage

Usage

Technologies

Technologies