CONTACT Spike 240 vs PROTEK CROSS review

In this entry we are going to compare and review Continental CONTACT Spike 240 vs Michelin PROTEK CROSS tyres. Both manufactured by different brands, Continental and Michelin respectively, these tyres have been designed to be used for different purposes. Whilst Continental CONTACT Spike 240 is better for Urban/Tour activities, Michelin PROTEK CROSS is a great choice if your needs are more aligned to city activities.

CONTACT Spike 240	PROTEK CROSS

Our recommendation for snow and icy roads	Explore on and off-road in all conditions
Safety during cold and dark seasons: The spikes guarantee traction, the reflective stripes ensure visibility. Maintain full control of your bicycle even in turns and hard stops.Choose between 120 or 240 spikes.	Thanks to the new generation of 1mm reinforcement offering effective anti-puncture protection
Features eBike Suitable for E-Bikes For our E-Bike tire we fall back on over 100 years‘ experience with moped and motorcycle tires. All of our city/trekking tires are rated to a standard speed of at least 25 km/h. Those tires marked e50 are also certified for S-Pedelecs. With their high quality structure, puncture protection is high and the rolling resistance is low offering protection from premature wear brought about by the additional driving force. SafetySystem Breaker Puncture protection with a system The SafetySystem Breaker is made up of Kevlarreinforced, high-strength nylon fabric. Puncture and cut-resistant but nevertheless light and flexible, the tire adjusts quickly to the surface below. Without raising the weight or rolling resistance noticeably, it protects the carcass against foreign objects and contributes to a longer lifespan of the tire. Tires with the SafetySystem Breaker also provide good comfort properties.	Features -
Usage -	Usage urban trekking
Technologies -	Technologies -
-	-
-	-

CONTACT Spike 240 vs PROTEK CROSS review

Features

eBike

SafetySystem Breaker

Features

Usage

Usage

Technologies

Technologies