CONTACT Spike 240 vs FORCE AM2 COMPETITION LINE review

In this entry we are going to compare and review Continental CONTACT Spike 240 vs Michelin FORCE AM2 COMPETITION LINE tyres. Both manufactured by different brands, Continental and Michelin respectively, these tyres have been designed to be used for different purposes. Whilst Continental CONTACT Spike 240 is better for Urban/Tour activities, Michelin FORCE AM2 COMPETITION LINE is a great choice if your needs are more aligned to mtb activities.

CONTACT Spike 240	FORCE AM2 COMPETITION LINE

Our recommendation for snow and icy roads	A fast tire on hard-packed terrain
Safety during cold and dark seasons: The spikes guarantee traction, the reflective stripes ensure visibility. Maintain full control of your bicycle even in turns and hard stops.Choose between 120 or 240 spikes.	A specialized tire for hard and mixed terrain, which optimizes efficiency for All Mountain riding
Features eBike Suitable for E-Bikes For our E-Bike tire we fall back on over 100 years‘ experience with moped and motorcycle tires. All of our city/trekking tires are rated to a standard speed of at least 25 km/h. Those tires marked e50 are also certified for S-Pedelecs. With their high quality structure, puncture protection is high and the rolling resistance is low offering protection from premature wear brought about by the additional driving force. SafetySystem Breaker Puncture protection with a system The SafetySystem Breaker is made up of Kevlarreinforced, high-strength nylon fabric. Puncture and cut-resistant but nevertheless light and flexible, the tire adjusts quickly to the surface below. Without raising the weight or rolling resistance noticeably, it protects the carcass against foreign objects and contributes to a longer lifespan of the tire. Tires with the SafetySystem Breaker also provide good comfort properties.	Features -
Usage -	Usage e-bike all mountain
Technologies -	Technologies -
-	-
-	-

CONTACT Spike 240 vs FORCE AM2 COMPETITION LINE review

Features

eBike

SafetySystem Breaker

Features

Usage

Usage

Technologies

Technologies