Aggressor vs E-WILD FRONT review
In this entry we are going to compare and review Maxxis Aggressor vs Michelin E-WILD FRONT tyres. Both manufactured by different brands, Maxxis and Michelin respectively, these tyres have been designed to be used for different purposes. Whilst Maxxis Aggressor is better for mountain activities, Michelin E-WILD FRONT is a great choice if your needs are more aligned to mtb activities.
Aggressor | E-WILD FRONT | ||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
The Maxxis Aggressor is designed for high-speed, hard-packed, rocky trails. It works especially well as a rear tire paired with a Minion DHF or Assegai in the front. | Using E-GUM-X, a new rubber compromising lateral and central rubbers designed to optimize grip, with a tread pattern from the Enduro ranges for a better hold. | ||||||||||||||||
Features
| Features- | ||||||||||||||||
UsageTrail Enduro | Usageenduro e-bike | ||||||||||||||||
Technologies
| Technologies- | ||||||||||||||||
- | - | ||||||||||||||||
Specifications26
27.5
29
| - |