Aggressor vs Double Fighter III review
In this entry we are going to compare and review Maxxis Aggressor vs Continental Double Fighter III tyres. Both manufactured by different brands, Maxxis and Continental respectively, these tyres have been designed to be used for different purposes. Whilst Maxxis Aggressor is better for mountain activities, Continental Double Fighter III is a great choice if your needs are more aligned to Mountainbike Tires activities.
Aggressor | Double Fighter III | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
The Maxxis Aggressor is designed for high-speed, hard-packed, rocky trails. It works especially well as a rear tire paired with a Minion DHF or Assegai in the front. | The ‘double’: light rolling and quiet on tarmac, yet grips on tracks and gravel roads.Robust rubber sidewalls make it impervious to damage even over rough ground.The ideal tire for transforming an off road bike to a nippy city racer. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Features
| Features
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
UsageTrail Enduro | Usage- | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Technologies
| Technologies- | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
- | - | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Specifications26
27.5
29
| Specifications"29"
"28"
"27.5"
"26"
"24"
"20"
"16"
|