PD-ES600 vs PD-M9120 review

In this entry we are going to compare and review Shimano PD-ES600 vs Shimano PD-M9120 pedals. Both manufactured by the same brand Shimano, these pedals have been designed to be used for different purposes. Whilst Shimano PD-ES600 is better for pedal trekking activities, Shimano PD-M9120 is a great choice if your needs are more aligned to pedal offroad activities.

PD-ES600

PD-M9120

Features

Adjustable entry and release tension settings
Compatible with recessed cleat SPD shoes for walking ease
Low profile single-sided entry SPD design
Wide platform for the efficient transfer of power from SPD shoes
Our lightest SPD pedal for road bikes

Features

Extra long and wide pedal-to-shoe contact area
Pedal design protects binding mechanism
Slimmer axle housing better sheds mud and debris
Wide-bearing placement for rigidity and uniform load distribution
Wider platform increases stability and control when not clipped in

Usage

Technologies

MUD SHEDDING DESIGN
Open binding mechanism to better shed mud
SPD
Recessed, walkable cleat design

Technologies

SPD
Recessed, walkable cleat design
MUD SHEDDING DESIGN
Open binding mechanism to better shed mud

Specifications

Type: Road (SPD)
Cleat included: SM-SH51
Binding: Single Sided
Remarks: 1.0 mm cleat spacer included
Sealed mechanism: ✔
Average weight: 279 ( /pair)
Cartridge axle: ✔
Reflector: SM-PD62
Color: Dark Gray
SERIES: ULTEGRA R8000 Series
Optional cleat: SM-SH56
Cleat retention adjuster: ✔
MODEL NO: PD-ES600

Specifications

MODEL NO: PD-M9120
Cleat included: SM-SH51
Sealed mechanism: ✔
Type: Off-Road (SPD)
Average weight: 398 ( /pair)
Remarks: 1.0 mm cleat spacer included
Reflector: SM-PD60
Integrated cage: ✔
SERIES: XTR M9100 Series
Color: Black
Optional cleat: SM-SH56
Binding: Dual Sided
Cartridge axle: ✔
Cleat retention adjuster: ✔

PD-ES600 vs PD-M9120 review

Features

Features

Usage

Usage

Technologies

MUD SHEDDING DESIGN

SPD

Technologies

SPD

MUD SHEDDING DESIGN

Specifications

Specifications